We interviewed an AI program (ChatGPT) for Spectroscopy asking questions about AI and its role in various applications for vibrational and atomic spectroscopy, including data analysis. For vibrational spectroscopy we asked about Raman, Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR), near-infrared (NIR), ultraviolet-visible (UV-vis), terahertz (THz), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR); for atomic spectroscopy we inquired about inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES), inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), and atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS). We asked 20 general questions for this interview, keeping in mind that our readers want to know all they can about how to use AI for their analytical chemistry needs. We also included a set of references and further reading for those wishing to look more deeply into the subject of AI and spectroscopy.
We note that a formal definition of AI does not always indicate the use of neural networks. Neural networks are one of the many techniques used in AI, but they are not the only ones. AI encompasses a wide range of techniques and approaches, including rule-based systems, decision trees, genetic algorithms, and others (See our February, 2023 issue). While neural networks have gained prominence in recent years due to their ability to handle complex data and perform well on a variety of tasks, AI as a field is much broader and includes a range of techniques that do not rely on neural networks.
What are some of the specific ways in which AI is currently being used in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy?
AI is being used in spectroscopy in eight major ways. Refer to reference (1–15) for examples.
How can AI be used for spectral interpretation in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy?
AI can be used for spectral interpretation in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy by training machine learning models to identify spectral features, classify compounds, and predict molecular properties. For example, neural networks can be trained on large spectral datasets to identify characteristic peaks in infrared and Raman spectra, allowing for automated compound identification and quantification. Support vector machines can also be used to classify unknown samples based on their spectral fingerprints. In addition, deep learning algorithms such as convolutional neural networks can be used to analyze atomic spectra to identify emission or absorption lines and predict atomic properties such as ionization energy and electron affinity. AI can also be used to optimize experimental parameters in spectroscopy, such as laser pulse duration and wavelength, to improve spectral resolution and sensitivity. Furthermore, AI can assist in the interpretation of complex spectra, such as those containing overlapping bands or multiple components, by using machine learning algorithms to deconvolute spectra and identify individual contributions. Finally, AI can aid in the design of new spectroscopic techniques and instruments, such as developing new laser sources or detectors optimized for specific spectral regions.
What are some of the challenges associated with using AI for spectral interpretation in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy?
While AI can improve spectral interpretation, there are challenges associated with its implementation in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy. Firstly, collecting large amounts of high-quality spectral data for AI training can be time-consuming and costly. Secondly, spectral variability can be challenging due to factors such as sample inhomogeneity and spectral noise. Thirdly, the complex and nonlinear relationships between the spectra and the underlying chemical information can make accurate spectral interpretation challenging. Fourthly, overfitting and underfitting can occur in the AI model, leading to overconfidence or underperformance. Fifthly, the black-box nature of some AI models can make it difficult to understand and interpret the reasoning behind the model's output. Lastly, the lack of standards for reporting AI models in spectroscopy can lead to a lack of transparency and reproducibility, hindering the wider adoption of AI in the field.
How can AI be used for quality control in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy?
AI can be used for quality control in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy in several ways. One such method is by developing models for the identification and quantification of impurities and contaminants in raw materials. AI algorithms can also be used to detect and classify samples that do not meet specified quality standards. Furthermore, AI can be used to monitor the consistency of production processes in real-time. This can be done by comparing real-time spectral data with a database of previously recorded spectral data from acceptable products. AI can also be used to identify trends in data that can be used to predict future quality control issues. Additionally, AI can be used to optimize the instrument settings and parameters for spectral acquisition to maximize spectral quality and resolution. Finally, AI can be used to automate routine spectral interpretation tasks to increase efficiency and reduce the potential for human error.
How can AI be used to optimize data acquisition in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy?
AI can be used to optimize data acquisition in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy by predicting the optimal experimental conditions to achieve the desired results. For example, AI algorithms can be used to predict the optimal laser intensity, wavelength, and pulse duration for Raman spectroscopy. Similarly, AI algorithms can be used to optimize the parameters of the excitation source for atomic spectroscopy. By using AI to optimize data acquisition, researchers can reduce experimental time and improve the accuracy and precision of their measurements. AI can also be used to reduce noise and artifacts in the acquired data. For example, AI algorithms can be used to remove baseline drifts, cosmic ray interference, and other sources of noise from Raman and atomic spectra. Additionally, AI can be used to reduce the amount of data required for accurate spectral analysis by identifying the most informative spectral regions and reducing the number of data points needed to obtain reliable results. Finally, AI can be used to automate the data acquisition process by controlling the instrument parameters in real-time based on the feedback from the analysis of the acquired spectra.
What are some of the key considerations when implementing AI for data analysis in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy?
When implementing AI for data analysis in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy, several key considerations should be taken into account. Firstly, the quality of the data being fed into the AI system is critical as poor quality data can significantly impact the accuracy and reliability of the results. Secondly, the AI algorithms used for data analysis must be chosen carefully and should be optimized for the specific application. Thirdly, the size and complexity of the data set must be considered, as large data sets can require significant computational resources and specialized hardware. Fourthly, the AI system must be regularly updated and trained on new data to ensure it remains accurate and up to date. Fifthly, the potential impact of false positives or false negatives should be considered, especially in applications where the results are critical for decision making. Finally, the ethical implications of using AI for data analysis should be considered, such as ensuring transparency, fairness, and accountability in the decision-making process.
How can AI be used for multivariate data analysis in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy?
AI can be used for multivariate data analysis in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy by extracting valuable information from complex datasets. One way to accomplish this is through the use of machine learning algorithms, such as principal component analysis (PCA) and partial least squares (PLS) regression. These algorithms can identify correlations between variables and create predictive models for spectral data. AI can also be used to perform feature selection, which involves identifying the most important variables for a given analysis. This reduces the dimensionality of the dataset and can improve model accuracy. Another approach is clustering, which groups similar samples based on their spectral properties. This can help identify trends or patterns in the data that may not be apparent otherwise. Additionally, AI can be used for anomaly detection, which involves identifying samples that deviate from expected patterns. Finally, deep learning techniques, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), can be used to analyze complex spectral images, such as those obtained through hyperspectral imaging. Overall, AI provides a powerful tool for multivariate data analysis in vibrational and atomic spectroscopy, enabling more accurate and efficient data interpretation.
How can AI improve the accuracy and precision of spectral analysis?
AI can improve the accuracy and precision of spectral analysis in several ways. Firstly, it can identify and correct errors in the data that can arise from factors such as noise, baseline drift, and spectral interferences. Secondly, it can identify and remove outliers, which can have a significant impact on the accuracy of the analysis. Thirdly, it can enable the automatic selection of the optimal method and parameters for spectral analysis, including the choice of preprocessing, peak detection, and calibration methods. Fourthly, it can enable the automated correction of spectral drift and other systematic errors that can affect the accuracy and precision of the analysis. Fifthly, it can enable the automated detection of spectral features that are difficult to identify by manual inspection, such as subtle changes in peak shape or position. Finally, it can enable the integration of data from multiple sources, such as different instruments or data types, to improve the accuracy and precision of the analysis.
What are some challenges in applying AI to atomic spectroscopy?
Applying AI to atomic spectroscopy has some challenges that need to be addressed. One of the primary challenges is the limited availability of labeled data, as the cost of labeling atomic spectra can be expensive. Additionally, the noise and variability in atomic spectra data can make it difficult for AI algorithms to distinguish between different signals, leading to errors in classification and prediction. Another challenge is the complexity of atomic spectra, which can make it difficult to extract meaningful features for analysis. This complexity is exacerbated by the fact that different elements can produce very similar spectra, making it difficult for AI algorithms to distinguish between them. The diversity of instruments and experimental conditions used to acquire atomic spectra can also pose challenges, as these factors can introduce additional variability in the data. Finally, there is a need for standardization of data acquisition and processing protocols to ensure that the AI algorithms can be trained on consistent data, which can be challenging given the diversity of techniques used in atomic spectroscopy.
Can AI be used to identify unknown compounds in spectral data?
Yes, AI can be used to identify unknown compounds in spectral data. One approach is to use machine learning algorithms that are trained on a large database of known compounds. The algorithm can then be used to analyze the spectral data of an unknown compound and compare it to the database to identify the closest match. Another approach is to use deep learning techniques such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to analyze the spectral data directly. The CNN can learn to recognize patterns in the spectral data that are characteristic of specific compounds and use this information to identify unknown compounds.
However, there are challenges in using AI for compound identification, including the need for high-quality spectral data, the availability of a comprehensive database of known compounds, and the potential for false positive and false negative results. The accuracy of AI-based identification also depends on the similarity of the unknown compound to the compounds in the database and the quality of the spectral data. Another challenge is the interpretation of the results, as the output of the AI algorithm may not be easily interpretable by non-experts, requiring additional analysis and validation. Therefore, the use of AI for compound identification should be complemented by expert knowledge and manual validation to ensure the accuracy and reliability of the results.
Can AI be used to improve the accuracy and sensitivity of Raman spectroscopy?
Yes, AI has been applied to improve the performance of Raman spectroscopy. For example, machine learning algorithms have been used to reduce the effects of sample variability and to improve the signal-to-noise ratio in Raman spectra. Additionally, AI can be used to develop models that can predict the properties of samples based on their Raman spectra, enabling more accurate and sensitive analysis (4–6).
How can AI improve the speed and efficiency of data analysis in atomic spectroscopy?
AI can improve the speed and efficiency of data analysis in atomic spectroscopy by automating data processing and analysis. For example, machine learning algorithms can be used to automatically detect and quantify trace elements in complex samples, reducing the time and effort required for manual analysis. Additionally, AI can be used to optimize experimental parameters and improve the accuracy and precision of atomic spectroscopy measurements.
Can AI be used to identify and classify unknown compounds in NMR spectra?
Yes, AI can be used to identify and classify unknown compounds in NMR spectra. For example, machine learning algorithms can be used to create models that can accurately predict the chemical shifts of various atoms in a molecule, enabling identification of unknown compounds based on their NMR spectra. Additionally, AI can be used to classify compounds based on their NMR spectra, enabling rapid identification of similar compounds and aiding in the discovery of new molecules (7).
How can AI be used to optimize experimental parameters in ICP-MS analysis?
AI can be used to optimize experimental parameters in ICP-MS analysis by enabling automated and intelligent parameter selection. For example, machine learning algorithms can be used to predict the optimal parameters for ICP-MS analysis based on the characteristics of the sample and the desired analytical performance. Additionally, AI can be used to monitor and adjust experimental parameters in real-time, enabling more efficient and effective analysis (8–9).
Can AI be used to improve the accuracy and precision of XRF analysis?
Yes, AI can be used to improve the accuracy and precision of XRF analysis. For example, machine learning algorithms can be used to correct for matrix effects and sample variability, enabling more accurate and precise quantification of trace elements in complex samples. Additionally, AI can be used to optimize experimental parameters and improve the sensitivity of XRF analysis, enabling detection of trace elements at lower concentrations.
How can AI be used to predict the properties of materials based on their UV-vis spectra?
AI can be used to predict the properties of materials based on their UV-vis spectra by creating predictive models using machine learning algorithms. For example, models can be developed to predict the bandgap energy, refractive index, and other optical properties of materials based on their UV-vis spectra. Additionally, AI can be used to classify materials based on their UV-vis spectra, enabling rapid identification of materials with similar properties (10).
Can AI be used to automate the identification of peaks in FT-IR spectra?
Yes, AI can be used to automate the identification of peaks in FT-IR spectra. For example, machine learning algorithms can be used to detect and classify peaks in FT-IR spectra, enabling automated and accurate identification of spectral features. Additionally, AI can be used to remove noise and reduce the effects of sample variability, improving the accuracy and sensitivity of FT-IR spectroscopy (11–13).
How can AI be used to optimize experimental parameters in spectroscopy?
AI can be used to optimize experimental parameters in spectroscopy by leveraging machine learning techniques to identify the most important features in the data and determine the optimal conditions for data collection. For example, AI models can be used to identify the optimal wavelength range or spectral resolution for a particular analysis, or to optimize sample preparation or instrument settings. This can lead to more efficient and accurate spectroscopic analyses.
What role can AI play in the development of new spectroscopic techniques?
AI can play a key role in the development of new spectroscopic techniques by providing insights into the underlying physical processes that govern the spectral data. For example, machine learning models can be used to identify correlations between different spectral features and physical properties of the sample, leading to new insights into the molecular structure or chemical composition of the material. Additionally, AI can be used to design new experimental setups or optimize existing methods to improve the accuracy and sensitivity of spectroscopic measurements.
What are some potential future developments in AI-assisted spectroscopy?
One potential future development in AI-assisted spectroscopy is the integration of multiple spectroscopic techniques to provide a more comprehensive analysis of a sample. AI models can be used to combine data from different sources and identify correlations between different spectral features, leading to a more complete understanding of the sample composition and properties. Additionally, there is potential for AI to improve the speed and efficiency of spectroscopic analyses, allowing for real-time monitoring of chemical reactions or other dynamic processes. As AI technology continues to evolve, there are many exciting possibilities for the future of spectroscopic analysis (13–15).
(1) Xu, Y.; Liu, X.; Cao, X.; Huang, C.; Liu, E.; Qian, S.; Liu, X.; Wu, Y.; Dong, F.; Qiu, C. W.; Qiu, J. Artificial Intelligence: A Powerful Paradigm for Scientific Research. The Innovation 2021, 2 (4), 100179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100179
(2) Cova, T. F.; Pais, A. A. Deep Learning for Deep Chemistry: Optimizing the Prediction of Chemical Patterns. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 809. https://doi.org/10.3389/fchem.2019.00809
(3) Yang, J.; Xu, J, Zhang, X, Wu, C, Lin, T, Ying, Y. Deep Learning for Vibrational Spectral Analysis: Recent Progress and a Practical Guide. Analytica chimica acta 2019, 1081, 6–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.06.012
(4) Lussier, F.; Thibault, V.; Charron, B.; Wallace, G. Q.; Masson, J. F. Deep Learning and Artificial Intelligence Methods for Raman and Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering. TrAC, Trends Anal. Chem. 2020, 124, 115796. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115796
(5) Luo, R., Popp, J.; Bocklitz, T. Deep Learning for Raman Spectroscopy: A Review. Analytica 2022, 3 (3), 287–301. https://doi.org/10.3390/analytica3030020
(6) Ho, C. S.; Jean, N.; Hogan, C. A.; Blackmon L.; Jeffrey, S. S.; Holodniy, M.; Banaei, N.; Saleh, A. A.; Ermon, S.; Dionne, J. Rapid Identification of Pathogenic Bacteria Using Raman Spectroscopy and Deep Learning. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10 (1), 4927.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12898-9
(7) Chen, D.; Wang, Z.; Guo, D.; Orekhov, V.; Qu, X. Review and Prospect: Deep Learning in Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy. Chem. Eur. J. 2020, 26 (46), 10391–10401. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202000246
(8) Sun, G.; Zeng, Q.; Zhou, J. X. Machine Learning Coupled with Mineral Geochemistry Reveals the Origin of Ore Deposits. Ore Geol. Rev. 2022, 142, 104753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2022.104753
(9) Flores, K.; Turley, R. S.; Valdes, C.; Ye, Y.; Cantu, J.; Hernandez-Viezcas, J. A.; Parsons J. G.; Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. Environmental Applications and Recent Innovations in Single Particle Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (SP-ICP-MS). Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 2021, 56 (1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/05704928.2019.1694937
(10) Guo, Y.; Liu C.; Ye, R.; Duan, Q. Advances on Water Quality Detection by UV-vis Spectroscopy. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10 (19), 687. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10196874
(11) Yue, F.; Chen, C.; Yan, Z.; Chen, C.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, Z.; Zhang, F.; Lv, X. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy Combined with Deep Learning and Data Enhancement for Quick Diagnosis of Abnormal Thyroid Function. Photodiagnosis Photodyn 2020, 32, 101923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdpdt.2020.101923
(12) Calle, J. L.; Ferreiro-González, M.; Ruiz-Rodríguez, A.; Fernández, D.; Palma, M. Detection of Adulterations in Fruit Juices Using Machine Learning Methods Over FT-IR Spectroscopic Data. Agronomy. 2022, 12 (3), 683. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030683
(13) Xu, J. L.; Riccioli, C.; Herrero-Langreo, A.; Gowen A, A. Deep Learning Classifiers for Near Infrared Spectral Imaging: A Tutorial. J. Spectr. Imaging 2020, 9. https://doi.org/10.1255/jsi.2020.a19
(14) Zhang, X.; Yang, J.; Lin, T.; Ying, Y. Food and Agro-Product Quality Evaluation Based on Spectroscopy and Deep Learning: A Review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 112, 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tifs.2021.04.008
(15) Gunaratne, T. M.; Gonzalez, Viejo C.; Gunaratne, N. M.; Torrico, D. D.; Dunshea, F. R.; Fuentes, S. Chocolate Quality Assessment Based on Chemical Fingerprinting Using Near Infra-red and Machine Learning Modeling. Foods 2019, 8 (10), 426. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods8100426
Jerome Workman, Jr. serves on the Editorial Advisory Board of Spectroscopy and is the Senior Technical Editor for LCGC and Spectroscopy. He is also a Certified Core Adjunct Professor at U.S. National University in La Jolla, California. He was formerly the Executive Vice President of Research and Engineering for Unity Scientific and Process Sensors Corporation.
Trends in Infrared Spectroscopic Imaging
September 13th 2013An interview with Rohit Bhargava, winner of the 2013 Craver Award. This interview is part of the 2013 podcast series presented in collaboration with the Federation of Analytical Chemistry and Spectroscopy Societies (FACSS), in connection with SciX 2013, the federation?s North American conference.
Measuring Microplastics in Remote and Pristine Environments
December 12th 2024Aleksandra "Sasha" Karapetrova and Win Cowger discuss their research using µ-FTIR spectroscopy and Open Specy software to investigate microplastic deposits in remote snow areas, shedding light on the long-range transport of microplastics.
The Fundamental Role of Advanced Hyphenated Techniques in Lithium-Ion Battery Research
December 4th 2024Spectroscopy spoke with Uwe Karst, a full professor at the University of Münster in the Institute of Inorganic and Analytical Chemistry, to discuss his research on hyphenated analytical techniques in battery research.
AI, Deep Learning, and Machine Learning in the Dynamic World of Spectroscopy
December 2nd 2024Over the past two years Spectroscopy Magazine has increased our coverage of artificial intelligence (AI), deep learning (DL), and machine learning (ML) and the mathematical approaches relevant to the AI topic. In this article we summarize AI coverage and provide the reference links for a series of selected articles specifically examining these subjects. The resources highlighted in this overview article include those from the Analytically Speaking podcasts, the Chemometrics in Spectroscopy column, and various feature articles and news stories published in Spectroscopy. Here, we provide active links to each of the full articles or podcasts resident on the Spectroscopy website.
Diffuse Reflectance Spectroscopy to Advance Tree-Level NSC Analysis
November 28th 2024Researchers have developed a novel method combining near-infrared (NIR) and mid-infrared (MIR) diffuse reflectance spectroscopy with advanced data fusion techniques to improve the accuracy of non-structural carbohydrate estimation in diverse tree tissues, advancing carbon cycle research.