Raster orbital scanning (ROS) is a technique that dramatically increases the signal-to-noise ratio of Raman measurements made from target materials dispersed on surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrates.
Raster orbital scanning (ROS) is a technique that dramatically increases the signal-to-noise ratio of Raman measurements made from target materials dispersed on surface enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) substrates. For SERS substrates, rastering a laser beam across the sample decreases the background and samples many more Raman-active compounds compared to traditional static-beam techniques. The lower average power created by rastering the beam with ROS dilutes the laser power over a larger sample area. This lower average power reduces the risk of damaging the substrate, which often increases the background of the Raman spectrum.
A key challenge in acquiring high quality Raman data is reducing the background component of the spectrum, which can obscure peaks and make sample identification difficult. When analyzing SERS samples, be aware that the target material likely will be dispersed non-uniformly on the substrate. As a result, the static, tightly-focused laser spot used in traditional Raman sampling will often poorly overlap the Raman-active material and measure mostly background substrate. Also, a static laser beam can cause localized heating and damage to the SERS substrate, further increasing the background of the spectrum. ROS sampling found in Ocean Optics IDRaman reader and IDRaman mini products overcomes these challenges and improves SERS measurements.
In Figure 1, Raman shift versus wavenumber is shown for a SERS-active nanoparticle membrane tagged with 2-mercaptopyridine-N-oxide measured at 4 mW of laser power. The benefit of ROS sampling is demonstrated when the spectrum measured with traditional Raman sampling (emulated by turning ROS sampling off) is compared to the spectrum measured with ROS sampling. When raster scanning is enabled, the background (represented by the hashed line in the ROS off example) is much lower and peaks are more clearly resolved. This allows simpler and more confident identification of the target material.
Figure 1: A SERS sample measured at 4 mW of laser power with and without ROS sampling. ROS reduces the background component of the spectrum by collecting more data from the Raman-active hotspots relative to the background. The elevated background of a traditional, static laser beam sampling method is illustrated by the hashed line.
Furthermore, the effect of localized heating damage on SERS substrates is demonstrated in Figure 1 via the hashed, horizontal line on the y-axis. When ROS is not used, the background increases substantially. The constant movement of the laser spot with ROS turned on (lower spectrum) minimizes sample damage caused by localized heating from a static, focused laser spot. Therefore, ROS enables the use of higher laser power without degrading the quality of the Raman measurement.
As shown in this application note, the measurement of SERS samples can be greatly improved with the use of ROS. ROS reduces the background component of SERS spectra and helps to reveal features previously hidden in the high background of SERS substrate measurements. In addition, ROS samples a larger area and facilitates the use of less expensive, less homogeneous SERS substrates with the same enhancement of Raman activity. Lastly, ROS enables the use of higher laser power without the risk of damaging the SERS substrates, increasing the signal enhancement realized by the SERS technique.
Ocean Optics
830 Douglas Avenue, Dunedin, FL 34698
tel. +1(727) 733-2447, fax: +1(727) 733-3962
Website: www.OceanOptics.com
Testing Solutions for Metals and PFAS in Water
January 22nd 2025When it comes to water analysis, it can be challenging for labs to keep up with ever-changing testing regulations while also executing time-efficient, accurate, and risk-mitigating workflows. To ensure the safety of our water, there are a host of national and international regulators such as the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), World Health Organization (WHO), and the European Union (EU) that demand stringent testing methods for drinking water and wastewater. Those methods often call for fast implementation and lengthy processes, as well as high sensitivity and reliable instrumentation. This paper explains how your ICP-MS, ICP-OES, and LC-MS-MS workflows can be optimized for compliance with the latest requirements for water testing set by regulations like US EPA methods 200.8, 6010, 6020, and 537.1, along with ISO 17294-2. It will discuss the challenges faced by regulatory labs to meet requirements and present field-proven tips and tricks for simplified implementation and maximized uptime.
Practical Autodilution for ICP-MS and ICP-OES
January 20th 2025Gain insights into improving efficiency and accuracy in elemental analysis through automated dilution technology. Learn about the key capabilities of the Agilent ADS 2 system and its seamless integration with ICP-MS and ICP-OES workflows.
UV-Vis Spectroscopy: Exporting Your Measurement Out of the Instrument
January 20th 2025Optical fibers in ultraviolet-visible (UV-Vis) spectroscopy can enable measurements outside the traditional sample compartment. This paper details the components needed for fiber optic systems, such as couplers and probes, and reviews the performance of Agilent's Cary series instruments. It is crucial to choose the right fiber optic setup for a specific lab’s needs to ensure accurate and efficient measurements.