Advancing Forensic Science with Chemometrics: New Tools for Objective Evidence Analysis

Courtroom in session © Kamonwan - stock.adobe.com

Forensic science is often the key to solving crimes, relying on physical evidence to reconstruct events and establish links between people, places, and objects. But traditional methods of evidence interpretation, often based on visual comparisons and expert judgment, are increasingly viewed as vulnerable to bias and subjective errors. To address these challenges, researchers Georgina Sauzier, Wilhelm van Bronswijk, and Simon W. Lewis from Curtin University’s School of Molecular and Life Sciences have published a review in Analyst outlining how chemometrics—a statistical toolset used for chemical data interpretation—can bring a new level of objectivity and rigor to forensic investigations (1).

Chemometrics: A New Era of Forensic Analysis

Chemometrics, originally developed for chemical data analysis in the 1970s mainly for process monitoring and spectroscopic calibrations, applies statistical approaches to analyze complex chemical data. Its application in forensic science has grown steadily over the years, particularly for interpreting multivariate data such as is produced by techniques like Fourier-transform infrared (FT-IR) and Raman spectroscopy, and by various chromatographic methods. These analytical methods are widely used in forensic investigations to analyze trace evidence like fibers, soils, tissue fluids, paints, and explosives (1–3).

The researchers argue that while forensic science has traditionally relied on expert interpretation of such data, this process can be slow, labor-intensive, and prone to cognitive and social biases. Reports from institutions like the U.S. National Academy of Sciences and the U.K.'s Forensic Science Regulator have called for more reliable, objective methods of evidence interpretation. Chemometrics offers a promising solution by allowing forensic examiners to move beyond subjective visual analysis and make data-driven interpretations using statistical models (1).

Read More: Chemometrics in Forensics

Key Approaches in Chemometrics

The review article outlines several chemometric techniques that have been used to enhance the analysis of forensic evidence. Techniques such as principal component analysis (PCA), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) are widely used for pattern recognition in complex datasets, while newer methods like support vector machines (SVM) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) are emerging as powerful tools for more sophisticated modeling. These approaches help simplify the interpretation of large, complex datasets, revealing hidden trends that might be missed through traditional analysis (1).

For example, in a case where trace evidence like soil or glass is transferred between surfaces, chemometric models can provide a quantitative measure of similarity between samples from a crime scene and a suspect, potentially leading to more definitive connections. By reducing the dimensionality of the data, chemometric techniques can also enhance the accuracy of matching known reference samples and unknown or questioned samples (1–3).

Applications Across Forensic Disciplines

Chemometrics has shown utility in a wide range of forensic disciplines, according to the review. These techniques have been used to analyze everything from drug compounds and toxicological data to trace evidence such as glass, fibers, and explosives. In toxicology, chemometric models can improve the identification of unknown substances by comparing spectral data against large chemical databases. Similarly, in arson investigations, chemometrics has been employed to differentiate between accelerants and other chemical residues, providing clearer insights into the cause of a fire (1).

In forensic DNA analysis, where complex probabilistic methods are already used, chemometrics can complement frequentist and Bayesian approaches by enhancing the interpretation of mixed or low-quality samples. By integrating statistical inference methods with chemometric tools, forensic scientists can assess the strength of evidence with greater precision (1).

Challenges and Future Directions

Despite its potential, the widespread adoption of chemometrics in forensic science faces several challenges. According to the Curtin University team, one key issue is the validation of chemometric methods against known "ground-truth" samples. Before these techniques can be used routinely in forensic laboratories, their accuracy, error rates, and reliability need to be thoroughly documented and tested. Additionally, chemometric analyses must meet the stringent scientific standards required for legal admissibility in court (1–3).

Nevertheless, the increasing volume of literature on the subject suggests that chemometric techniques are on the verge of becoming mainstream in forensic investigations. As forensic science moves toward greater objectivity and quantitative rigor, chemometrics could play a crucial role in transforming the way evidence is interpreted and presented in legal contexts (1-3).

The review by Sauzier, van Bronswijk, and Lewis underscores the growing importance of chemometrics in forensic science. By offering more objective and statistically validated methods for analyzing evidence, chemometrics has the potential to reduce bias, increase accuracy, and strengthen the credibility of forensic conclusions in court. While challenges remain, the ongoing development of chemometric tools promises to critically advance forensic investigations in the near future (1).

References

(1) Sauzier, G.; van Bronswijk, W.; Lewis, S. W. Chemometrics in Forensic Science: Approaches and Applications. Analyst, 2021,146 (8), 2415–2448. DOI: 10.1039/D1AN00082A

(2) Workman, J. Identification of Body Fluid Traces for Forensic Purposes: An Interview with Igor Lednev. https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/identification-of-body-fluid-traces-for-forensic-purposes-an-interview-with-igor-lednev (accessed 2024-10-15).

(3) Workman, J. Applying Raman and Infrared Spectroscopy in Forensic Paint Analysis: Spectroscopy Interview with Barry Lavine. https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/applying-raman-and-infrared-spectroscopy-in-forensic-paint-analysis (accessed 2024-10-15).