Spectroscopy
In this X-ray tutorial, the authors attempt to answer the frequently asked question, "How deep do the X-rays penetrate my sample?"
X-rays are attenuated as they pass through matter. That is, the intensity of an X-ray beam decreases the farther it penetrates into matter. Basically, each interaction of an X-ray photon with an atom of the material removes an X-ray from the beam, decreasing its intensity.
The amount of decrease in intensity of the X-ray beam depends upon two factors:
The intensity decreases exponentially with the distance traveled, or
I = I0exp (– Ax)
where I0 is the initial X-ray beam intensity. Note that this exponential decay of photon intensity applies in the optical region of the electromagnetic spectrum as well. In this region, it is known as the Beer–Lambert law.
The quantity A is the linear absorption coefficient. Note that the term μ , by conventional nomeclature, is often referred to as the linear attenuation coefficient. These two coefficients are related by the density of the material (ρ) as μ = A/ρ.
An interesting application of this equation is to determine the depth of penetration of X-rays. The attenuation length is defined as the depth into the material where the intensity of the X-rays has decreased to about 37% (1/e) of the value at the surface. That is, I = (1/e)I0, or I/I0 = 1/e. [Recall that e, sometimes called Euler's number or Napier's constant, is the base of natural logarithms, or e ≈ 2.7183.] Then, substituting into Equation 1, we get
(I/I0) = exp (–μρx)
ln (1/e) = (–μρx)
–1 = (–μρx)
x = 1/(μρ)
This also is referred to as the "mean free path" of the X-rays.
For example, given a 109Cd radioisotope source of X-rays with an energy of 22.1 keV, how far do these penetrate a piece of pure iron, (atomic number 26)? From Table I, we find the mass absorption coefficient for iron at 22.1 keV is μ = 18.2 cm2/g. The density of iron ρ = 7.86 g/cm3. Plugging in the numbers, we find x = 0.007 cm = 0.07 mm = 70 μm. A comparison of this depth for the same incoming X-ray energy both for lighter and heavier elements is shown in Table I.
Table 1
Figure 1: Attenuation of X-ray intensity.
We need a source of X-rays — the radioisotope Cd-109 or an X-ray tube, for example — and a detector such as a Geiger counter. Place a piece of foil of thickness t1 between the source and detector and measure the radiation intensity I1, as shown in Figure 1. Now place a second piece of foil with a thickness t2 in the path and measure the new intensity I2. If the original beam intensity is I0, then we can write
I1 = I0 exp (–μρt1)
I2 = I0 exp (–μρt2)
Dividing these equations,
(I1/I2) = exp (– μρt1)/exp (– μρt2)
or
μ = ln (I1/I2)/ρ (t2 – t1)
For example, we use an X-ray tube run at 35 kV and a 0.025-mm thick piece of copper foil. With one foil thickness, our Geiger counter measures 185,000 counts per minute (cpm). When the foil is doubled and the measurement repeated, we find a count rate of about 155,000 cpm. The density of copper is 8.94 g/cm3. Then
μ = ln (185,000/155,000) / (8.94 g/cm3)(0.005 cm – 0.0025 cm)
or
μ = 7.9 cm2/g
The accepted value for the mass absorption coefficient of copper at this energy is approximately 7.0 cm2/g. This is a reasonable agreement given the rather crude experimental set-up in which the Geiger counter used had a low-resolution analog readout meter.
When a sample contains more than one component, the total mass absorption coefficient is the sum of the individual coefficients, each multiplied by the weight fraction present. That is,
Consider an alloy containing 70% Ni and 30% Mo. What is the mass absorption coefficient of this sample at an excitation energy of 22.1 keV (109Cd radioisotope emission)?
For nickel: μ (22.1 keV) = 23.8 cm2/g
For molybdenum: μ (22.1 keV) = 61.9 cm2/g
Therefore,
μs = (CNi)(μNi) + (CMo)(μMo) = (0.7)(23.8) + (0.3)(61.9) = 35.3 cm2/g
The mass absorption coefficient of a material is energy dependent. In general, this coefficient decreases with increasing energy of the penetrating X-rays. Figure 2 shows a plot of the mass absorption coefficient for molybdenum from about 7 to 35 keV.
Figure 2: Mass absorption coefficient of molybdenum.
Note, however, that we do observe sharp increases in this coefficient at certain energies. These discontinuities occur at the minimum energies for excitation of a particular electron shell, that is, at the binding energies. For example, in Figure 2, we find a discontinuity at about 20 keV. This is the K-shell electron binding energy.
These discontinuities in the mass absorption coefficient are called "absorption edges." After an absorption edge, the general decrease with increasing energy continues.
Figure 3 presents the energy dependence of the mass absorption coefficient of Molybdenum in the more traditional log–log format. Also evident are the L absorption edges at about 2.5, 2.6, and 2.9 keV. These correspond to the electron binding energies of the three L-shell subshells.
Figure 3: LogâÂÂlog plot of mass absorption coefficient of molybdenum.
The attenuation of X-rays by matter is a specific example of the more general phenomenon of the attenuation of electromagnetic radiation by matter. In the optical region of the E–M spectrum, this phenomenon finds significant spectrometric application in the form of the Beer–Lambert law.
In the X-ray region, this attenuation is characterized by the mass absorption coefficient of the matter, an important consideration in X-ray fluorescence spectrometry. A frequently asked question is, "How deep do the X-rays penetrate my sample?" We have attempted to answer this question here.
1. The number of photons absorbed ΔI in a given thickness Δx is proportional to the incident intensity I and the thickness:
ΔI proportional to IΔx
where the minus sign indicates a decreasing intensity with thickness.
2. Let A be the constant of proportionality, the absorption coefficient, and we can write
ΔI = AIΔx
3. Letting the deltas become infinitesimally small, we have, in differential notation,
dI = AIdx
4. Integrating from x = 0 to a depth x, we get
I = I0 exp (–Ax)
where I0 is the initial intensity at x = 0.
1. For mass absorption coefficients and other X-ray related element properties, see www.csrri.iit.edu/periodic-table.html.
2. For a free copy of the X-Ray Data Booklet from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, go to http://xdb.lbl.gov.
Volker Thomsen, Debbie Schatzlein, and David Mercuro are with Thermo Electron Corporation's Portable Elemental Analysis Division, formerly known as NITON LLC (Billerica, MA). E-mail: VThomsen@NITON.comDSchatzlein@NITON.com and DMercuro@NITON.com
The Advantages and Landscape of Hyperspectral Imaging Spectroscopy
December 9th 2024HSI is widely applied in fields such as remote sensing, environmental analysis, medicine, pharmaceuticals, forensics, material science, agriculture, and food science, driving advancements in research, development, and quality control.
Portable and Wearable Spectrometers in Our Future
December 3rd 2024The following is a summary of selected articles published recently in Spectroscopy on the subject of handheld, portable, and wearable spectrometers representing a variety of analytical techniques and applications. Here we take a closer look at the ever shrinking world of spectroscopy devices and how they are used. As spectrometers progress from bulky lab instruments to compact, portable, and even wearable devices, the future of spectroscopy is transforming dramatically. These advancements enable real-time, on-site analysis across diverse industries, from healthcare to environmental monitoring. This summary article explores cutting-edge developments in miniaturized spectrometers and their expanding range of practical applications.
Mass Spectrometry for Forensic Analysis: An Interview with Glen Jackson
November 27th 2024As part of “The Future of Forensic Analysis” content series, Spectroscopy sat down with Glen P. Jackson of West Virginia University to talk about the historical development of mass spectrometry in forensic analysis.
Analyzing Oxygen Vacancy Using X-Ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy
November 26th 2024A new study published in the Journal of the European Ceramic Society introduces three XPS methodologies for accurately quantifying oxygen vacancies in metal oxides, challenging traditional misinterpretations and advancing material science research.