From the Editors
A note from the editors of Spectroscopy regarding the "H-Classic Papers in Atomic Spectroscopy" article published in the November 2021 issue.
In the November 2021 issue of Spectroscopy, we published a review paper titled “H-Classic Papers in Atomic Spectroscopy: An Integrative Literature Review” (1). This paper caused quite a bit of concern in the atomic spectroscopy community, and understandably so.
In the work, the authors, who are faculty in a computer science department at a university outside the United States, presented a list of 64 papers that fit, according to the research criteria, the definition of “H-Classic” papers—highly cited papers that made key contributions to the field. When expert members of the atomic spectroscopy community read the paper, however, they found that many seminal works by icons in the field were missing. Several wrote to us, and we have published one comprehensive letter in this issue, from Mike Blades (page 10), along with a response from the authors.
The problem, which everyone quickly realized, resulted from a combination of two factors. First, the results were based on the use of a very limited search term, atomic spectroscopy, and second, the authors are computer scientists who did not realize the gaps because of their lack of familiarity with field of atomic spectroscopy.
The authors searched the Web of Science (WoS) for the years from 1968 to 2015 using the search term atomic spectroscopy. Their query identified 1214 papers in English, which were then sorted in descending order based on their respective citation counts. The H-Index, for the available data set, was found to be 64, and correspondingly, the first 64 articles were classified as the highly cited papers based on the H-Classic definition.
As the experts who wrote to us pointed out, it is very uncommon, especially in the older literature, for papers in the field to use the phrase atomic spectroscopy in the title or abstract; they might refer instead to a term such as atomic emission spectroscopy, inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), or ICP–mass spectrometry (ICP-MS).
Thus, the teachable moment. We can all easily imagine that any undergraduate student or skilled librarian could similarly misunderstand the essential keywords needed to identify a comprehensive set of critical papers in any given field. Something similar could happen in molecular spectroscopy if one used search terms like Raman spectroscopy, visible spectroscopy, or infrared spectroscopy. This situation serves as a reminder to all who conduct any sort of literature search and as valuable lesson to teach students. For this purpose, we have published a resource article on our website entitled, “Literature Searches: A Guide to Getting it Right”(2).
For our part, we also learned an important lesson. We recognize, as an editorial staff, that review articles like this one should be reviewed by experts in the specific field in question. To set the record straight, this paper was not reviewed by any members of our editorial advisory board (EAB). We pledge to seek this expertise in future general topic reviews. Given the volume of papers we are currently handling in peer review, and the range of subject areas addressed in them, which include specialized applications in areas like material science, physics, clinical applications, astrobiology, we will often need to reach beyond our EAB. But we will certainly seek the advice of truly expert reviewers, and will also invite our EAB to weigh in.
We thank those who wrote to us and spoke with us about this topic. We appreciate your passion for science and for getting things right, which we wholeheartedly embrace.
(1) M.R. Rafiq and S.M. Sait, Spectroscopy 36(11), 28–34,40 (2021). https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/h-classic-papers-in-atomic-spectroscopy-an-integrative-literature-review
(2) J. Workman, “Literature Searches: A Guide to Getting it Right,” Spectroscopy; online only. https://www.spectroscopyonline.com/view/literature-searches-a-guide-to-getting-it-right
Laura Bush is the editorial director of LCGC North America and Spectroscopy. Direct correspondence to: lbush@mjhlifesciences.com.
Jerome Workman is the Senior Technical Editor of LCGC North America and Spectroscopy. Direct correspondence to: jworkman@mjhlifesciences.com.
The 2025 Emerging Leader in Atomic Spectroscopy Award
February 15th 2025Benjamin T. Manard has won the 2025 Emerging Leader in Atomic Spectroscopy Award for his pioneering research in nuclear material characterization and isotope ratio analysis, with expertise in advanced atomic spectrometry techniques such as inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectroscopy (ICP-OES), inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS), and laser ablation.
Applications of Micro X-Ray Fluorescence Spectroscopy in Food and Agricultural Products
January 25th 2025In recent years, advances in X-ray optics and detectors have enabled the commercialization of laboratory μXRF spectrometers with spot sizes of ~3 to 30 μm that are suitable for routine imaging of element localization, which was previously only available with scanning electron microscopy (SEM-EDS). This new technique opens a variety of new μXRF applications in the food and agricultural sciences, which have the potential to provide researchers with valuable data that can enhance food safety, improve product consistency, and refine our understanding of the mechanisms of elemental uptake and homeostasis in agricultural crops. This month’s column takes a more detailed look at some of those application areas.
Best of the Week: Seed Vigor, Flower Classification, Emerging Leader in Atomic Spectroscopy
January 10th 2025Top articles published this week include two peer-reviewed articles that explore optical detection technology for seed vigor and classifying flowers, as well as a profile on Benjamin Manard, who was recognized as the winner of the 2025 Emerging Leader in Atomic Spectroscopy.