Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometers provide spectra in less time than scanning systems, but water vapor and/or CO2 in the sample chamber leads to additional peaks that may obscure important information. These interferences can be eliminated by sealing the sample chamber and purging with dry, CO2 free air (purge gas) or nitrogen for a short period of time.
Kim Myers, Parker Hannifin Filtration and Separation Division
Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectrometers provide spectra in less time than scanning systems, but water vapor and/or CO2 in the sample chamber leads to additional peaks that may obscure important information. These interferences can be eliminated by sealing the sample chamber and purging with dry, CO2 free air (purge gas) or nitrogen for a short period of time.
While dry CO2 free air (nitrogen) can be obtained from tanks and a desiccator, the use of an in-house generator that ports purge gas directly to the FT-IR is safer, more reliable, convenient, economical, and is more energy efficient than the use of tanks. Figure 1 shows a spectrum before and after purging the sample chamber using an in-house generator (Parker Balston Model 75-45NA, Parker Hannifin Corporation, Haverhill, Massachusetts).
A purge gas generator produces dry CO2 free air from compressed air using a coalescing filter element to remove particulate matter (dust, pump oil, and water particles), a pressure swing adsorption (PSA) system containing molecular sieves to remove the non-desired components of the input air and a high efficiency filter to remove particulate matter in the purge gas that may have been carried over from the molecular sieves. Systems are available to provide up to 216 scfh (102 lpm).
An in-house purge gas generator provides the following benefits:
Greater Safety — A small amount of gas is present at low pressure and is ported directly to the spectrometer (a gas tank may have a pressure > 2000 psi). A gas tank can become a guided missile if the valve is compromised, leading to the possibility of injury or damage during transportation and installation.
Convenience — The total cost of operation of the generator is extremely low, the raw materials are laboratory air and electricity and many users find that the payback for an in-house system is a year or less. The cost for using tank gas tanks includes the actual cost of the tank, the value of the time to change tanks, and related activities. The overall cost of tanks depends on a broad range of local parameters and the amount of gas that is used; considerable savings can be obtained from the use of an in-house purge gas generator.
Environmental Benefits — The energy requirements for an in-house purge gas generator is quite low. In contrast, when tanks are used, the gas is purified and compressed to 2000 psi. Once the tanks are filled, they must be transported to the end user's site and the empty tanks must be returned to the supplier.
The spectra comparison in Figure 1 illustrates that a Parker Balston FT-IR Purge Gas Generator allows an FT-IR to be purged at a much higher flow rate than is practical with nitrogen. The sample chamber purged by the Parker Balston unit if free of CO2 and water faster than the sample chamber purged by nitrogen.
Figure 1: A rapid purge of an FT-IR sample chamber using an in-house generator removes extraneous peaks.
Parker Hannifin Corporation Filtration and Separation Division
242 Neck Road, P.O. Box 8223, Haverhill MA 01835
tel. (800) 343-4048 or (978) 858-0505, fax (978) 556-7501 Website: www.labgasgenerators.com
Best of the Week: EAS Conference Coverage, IR Spectroscopy, Microplastics
November 22nd 2024Top articles published this week include highlights from the Eastern Analytical Symposium, a news article about the infrared (IR) spectroscopy market, and a couple of news articles recapping spectroscopic analysis of microplastics.
FT-IR Analysis of pH and Xylitol Driven Conformational Changes of Ovalbumin–Amide VI Band Study
November 21st 2024This study uses Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy to analyze how the globular protein ovalbumin's secondary structures transition under varying pH conditions in the presence of the cosolvent xylitol, highlighting the role of noncovalent interactions in these conformational changes.